The Butterfly Effect
The shift from order to chaos gained momentum in the mid-20th century. Inspired by John von Neumann’s vision of weather control, the U.S. government invested in advanced forecasting systems (Aspray, 1990). The results were humbling. Predictions faltered beyond three days, and seven-day forecasts proved unreliable. Meteorologist Edward Lorenz noted that while humans might alter the weather, they could never know its natural course without interference (Gleick, 1987, p. 20).
In 1961, Lorenz ran a weather simulation that upended expectations. Each iteration produced unique patterns, mirroring actual weather’s variability. Plotting the data, he saw an image resembling a butterfly’s wings. The cause? Tiny differences in initial conditions, like rounding a number from 0.506 to 0.51—grew exponentially over time.
In his 1972 talk, “Does the Flap of a Butterfly’s Wings in Brazil Set Off a Tornado in Texas?” Lorenz (1972) crystallized this idea as the “Butterfly Effect.” This concept became a pillar of chaos theory, showing how minute changes can transform both simple and complex systems.